Text
Why not trade pension claims?
Trading pension claims would serve many purposes. Beneficiaries would be able to diversify the idiosyncratic credit risk of their plan sponsors, and systematic risk could be reallocated to comply with individual risk-return preferences. The result would be an alignment of companies' and pension fund managers' incentives to keep fund plans fully funded--in line with beneficiary interests--which would lower agency costs and costs of government bailouts of defined-benefit plans and would improve the general welfare. As an accurate valuation of pension liabilities, trading would provide a measurable yardstick for plan managers.
Ketersediaan
| Call Number | Location | Available |
|---|---|---|
| FAJ6301 | PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
| Penerbit | Virginia: CFA Institute 2007 |
|---|---|
| Edisi | Vol. 63, No. 1, Jan. - Feb., 2007 |
| Subjek | Moral hazard Underfunded pension plans longevity risk pension claims trading Collateralized Pension Claim Obligation (CPCO) mark-to-market benchmarking |
| ISBN/ISSN | 0015198X |
| Klasifikasi | NONE |
| Deskripsi Fisik | 9 p. |
| Info Detail Spesifik | Financial Analysts Journal |
| Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
| Lampiran Berkas |