Logo

Pusat Sumber Belajar FEB UI

  • FAQ
  • Berita
  • Rooms
  • Bantuan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Indonesia
  • Search
  • Google
  • Advanced Search
*sometimes there will be ads at the top, just scroll down to the results of this web
No image available for this title

Text

Gridlock's gone, now what?

Beyer, Scott B. - ; Jensen, Gerald R. - ; Johnson, Robert R. - ;

This article examines the relationship between security returns and "political gridlock," which occurs when the U.S. House of Representatives, Senate, and presidency are not controlled by the same political party. The findings support the following conclusions: First, the common view that equities prosper during political gridlock is a myth. Second, fixed-income securities do prosper during gridlock. Third, large companies exhibit higher returns than small companies during gridlock. Finally, the relationship between gridlock and security returns is independent of monetary conditions; this finding supports the existence of a unique "gridlock effect." Overall, political conditions are relevant for investors, but previous views about their influence are misguided.


Ketersediaan

Call NumberLocationAvailable
FAJ6205PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana1
PenerbitVirginia: CFA Institute 2006
EdisiVol. 62, No. 5, Sep. - Oct., 2006
SubjekMonetary policy
market returns
political gridlock
equity performance
fixed-income securities
ISBN/ISSN0015198X
KlasifikasiNONE
Deskripsi Fisik8 p.
Info Detail SpesifikFinancial Analysts Journal
Other Version/RelatedTidak tersedia versi lain
Lampiran Berkas
  • Gridlock's Gone, Now What?
    Other Resource Link

Pencarian Spesifik
Where do you want to share?