Text
Critiques Charles Fishman’s The Wal-Mart Effect, arguing that Wal-Mart’s societal benefits—such as significant consumer savings ($30–$150 billion annually)—far outweigh its costs (e.g., job displacement, low wages). While acknowledging distributional concerns (e.g., poverty-level wages), the author emphasizes Wal-Mart’s efficiency gains and its disproportionate benefits for low-income consumers. The article also dismisses fears of Wal-Mart’s monopolistic power, citing historical parallels (e.g., anti-chain-store backlash in the 1920s) and current market constraints (e.g., declining growth rates). Ultimately, it calls for Wal-Mart to balance its low-price mission with greater transparency and social responsibility to mitigate criticism and align with societal expectations.
Call Number | Location | Available |
---|---|---|
AMP2003 | PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
Penerbit | Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management 2006 |
---|---|
Edisi | Vol. 20, No. 3, Aug., 2006 |
Subjek | Corporate social responsibility (CSR) Distributional Impact wal-mart effect consumer savings poverty wages historical parallels |
ISBN/ISSN | 15589080 |
Klasifikasi | NONE |
Deskripsi Fisik | 3 p. |
Info Detail Spesifik | Academy of Management Perspectives |
Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
Lampiran Berkas |