Text
This paper compares two approaches to the analysis of economic data: the exclusively econometric approach recommended by Hendry and Ericsson and the more eclectic approach that we employed in our books Monetary History and Monetary Trends. It concludes that the article by Hendry and Ericsson is mislabeled. Their article is not in any relevant sense an evaluation of our "empirical model of U.K. money demand." Rather, it uses one equation from our book as a peg on which to hang an exposition of sophisticated econometric techniques. Insofar as their empirical findings do bear on ours, they simply confirm some of our principal results and contradict none.
Call Number | Location | Available |
---|---|---|
TAER 8101 | PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
Penerbit | Nashville: American Economic Association 1991 |
---|---|
Edisi | Vol. 81, No. 1, Mar., 1991 |
Subjek | Money demand empirical analysis Economic data |
ISBN/ISSN | 0002-8282 |
Klasifikasi | NONE |
Deskripsi Fisik | 11 p. |
Info Detail Spesifik | The American Economic Review |
Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
Lampiran Berkas |