Text
Pearce and Huang (2012, this issue) argue that management research has has woefully little impact. In support of this contention, they attempt to demonstrate that there has been a decline in "actionable" management research in selected management journals, suggest that relatively few mentions of those journals in a publication such as The Economist are evidence of lack of impact, and offer a list of questions which they believe management research could more profitably address. I fully agree with Pearce and Huang's call to explore ways to enhance the impact of management research; however, I have serious questions about the authors' assumptions, logical development, methodology, representation of data, and recommendations. As such, whether there has actually been a decline in the impact and "actionability" of management research, I can't agree that Pearce and Huang's article provides meaningful input to this issue.
| Call Number | Location | Available |
|---|---|---|
| AMLE1102 | PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
| Penerbit | Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management 2012 |
|---|---|
| Edisi | Vol. 11, No. 2, June 2012 |
| Subjek | Research Impact Knowledge Communication Actionable Research Critique |
| ISBN/ISSN | 1537260X |
| Klasifikasi | NONE |
| Deskripsi Fisik | - |
| Info Detail Spesifik | Academy of Management Learning & Education |
| Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
| Lampiran Berkas |