Text
Is 75% of the Sales Promotion Bump Due to Brand Switching? No, Only 33% Is
Several researchers have decomposed sales promotion elasticities based on household scanner-panel data. A key result is that the majority of the sales promotion elasticity, approximately 74% on average, is attributed to secondary demand effects (brand switching) and the remainder is attributed to primary demand effects (timing acceleration and quantity increases). The authors demonstrate that this result does not imply that if a brand gains 100 units in sales during a promotion, the other brands in the category lose 74 units. The authors offer a complementary decomposition measure based on unit sales.
The measure shows the ratio of the current cross-brand unit sales loss to the current own-brand unit sales gain during promotion; the authors report empirical results for this measure. They also derive analytical expressions that transform the elasticity decomposition into a decomposition of unit sales effects. These expressions show the nature of the difference between the two decompositions. To gain insight into the magnitude of the difference, the authors apply these expressions to previously reported elasticity decomposition results and find that approximately 33% of the unit sales increase is attributable to losses incurred by other brands in the same category.
Ketersediaan
| Call Number | Location | Available |
|---|---|---|
| JM4002 | PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
| Penerbit | Chicago: American Marketing Association 2003 |
|---|---|
| Edisi | Vol. 40, No. 4 (Nov., 2003), pp. 481-491 |
| Subjek | Consumer behavior Sales promotion Behavioral Economics in Marketing Consumer Switching Behavior |
| ISBN/ISSN | 0022-2437 |
| Klasifikasi | NONE |
| Deskripsi Fisik | 11 p. |
| Info Detail Spesifik | Journal of Marketing |
| Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
| Lampiran Berkas |