Logo

Pusat Sumber Belajar FEB UI

  • FAQ
  • Berita
  • Rooms
  • Bantuan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Indonesia
  • Search
  • Google
  • Advanced Search
*sometimes there will be ads at the top, just scroll down to the results of this web
No image available for this title

Text

Rethinking Rouse and Daellenbach's rethinking: isolating vs. testing for sources of sustainable competitive advantage

Chi, Tailan - ; Levitas, Edward - ;

In a recent paper, Rouse and Daellenbach (1999) provide a 5-step methodological approach which they feel will cure alleged inadequacies in empirical resource-based research. This comment suggests, however, that their methodology can provide only a useful aid for expanding the understanding of potential sustainable competitive advantages but will not allow researchers to effectively verify those hypothesized advantages. Specifically, the comment argues that Rouse and Daellenbach's methodology is plagued by 3 major shortcomings: 1. It confuses the important distinction between knowing-how and knowing-what. 2. It fails to recognize the importance of observable variables in verifying the sources of sustainable competitive advantage. 3. It calls for sampling on the dependent variable.Printed Journal


Ketersediaan

Call NumberLocationAvailable
PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana1
Penerbit: John Wiley & Sons
Edisi-
SubjekStrategic management
Competitive advantage
Methods
Research
ISBN/ISSN1432095
Klasifikasi-
Deskripsi Fisik-
Info Detail Spesifik-
Other Version/RelatedTidak tersedia versi lain
Lampiran BerkasTidak Ada Data

Pencarian Spesifik
Where do you want to share?