Text
Further reflections on the elimination of framing bias in strategic decision making
Wright and Goodwin (2002) maintain that, in terms of experimental design and ecological validity, Hodgkinson et al. (1999) failed to demonstrate either that the framing bias is likely to be of salience in strategic decision making, or that causal cognitive mapping provides an effective means of limiting the damage accruing from this bias. In reply, it is shown that there is ample evidence to support both of the original claims. Moreover, using Wright and Goodwin's own data set, it is demonstrated that the studies did in fact attain appropriate levels of ecological validity, and that their proposed alternative to causal cognitive mapping, a decision tree approach, is far from "simpler." Wright and Goodwin's approach not only fails to eliminate the framing bias - it leads to confusion.Printed Journal
Ketersediaan
| Call Number | Location | Available |
|---|---|---|
| PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
| Penerbit | : John Wiley & Sons |
|---|---|
| Edisi | - |
| Subjek | Strategic management Decision making Bias Cognition & reasoning |
| ISBN/ISSN | 1432095 |
| Klasifikasi | - |
| Deskripsi Fisik | - |
| Info Detail Spesifik | - |
| Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
| Lampiran Berkas | Tidak Ada Data |