Text

Beyond correspondence? metaphor in organization theory

---

Recently, Cornelissen (2005) criticized comparison models of metaphor and proposed a "domains-interaction" model. His interest in cognitive science and the use of individually oriented examples of metaphor (i.e., learning and identity) is revealing. It is clear that Cornelissen takes a decidedly psychological view of metaphor. For him, the production and consumption of a metaphor are cognitive processes insofar as domains interact within a theorist's mind. For the authors, the production and consumption of metaphors can be conceived of as a social process where the producer and the consumer are different people. When viewed this way, metaphors are disseminated, interpreted, and unpacked through discourse and academic texts. Taking either a sociological or a psychological standpoint has implications for the way that new insights and knowledge generation are framed (i.e., as either social or cognitive phenomena). Moreover, the comparison and correspondence approaches to metaphor can be seen as complementary insofar as they both contribute to organizational theorizing, but have different points of emphasis and illuminate different aspects of the process.Printed Journal

---

Ketersediaan

Call Number	Location	Available
	PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana	1

Penerbit	Academy of Management.,
Edisi	-
Subjek	Organization theory Power studies Metaphor
ISBN/ISSN	3637425
Klasifikasi	-
Deskripsi Fisik	-
Info Detail Spesifik	-
Other Version/Related	Tidak tersedia versi lain
Lampiran Berkas	Tidak Ada Data