Text
Beyond correspondence? metaphor in organization theory
Recently, Cornelissen (2005) criticized comparison models of metaphor and proposed a "domains-interaction" model. His interest in cognitive science and the use of individually oriented examples of metaphor (i.e., learning and identity) is revealing. It is clear that Cornelissen takes a decidedly psychological view of metaphor. For him, the production and consumption of a metaphor are cognitive processes insofar as domains interact within a theorist's mind. For the authors, the production and consumption of metaphors can be conceived of as a social process where the producer and the consumer are different people. When viewed this way, metaphors are disseminated, interpreted, and unpacked through discourse and academic texts. Taking either a sociological or a psychological standpoint has implications for the way that new insights and knowledge generation are framed (i.e., as either social or cognitive phenomena). Moreover, the comparison and correspondence approaches to metaphor can be seen as complementary insofar as they both contribute to organizational theorizing, but have different points of emphasis and illuminate different aspects of the process.Printed Journal
Ketersediaan
| Call Number | Location | Available |
|---|---|---|
| PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
| Penerbit | : Academy of Management |
|---|---|
| Edisi | - |
| Subjek | Organization theory Power studies Metaphor |
| ISBN/ISSN | 3637425 |
| Klasifikasi | - |
| Deskripsi Fisik | - |
| Info Detail Spesifik | - |
| Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
| Lampiran Berkas | Tidak Ada Data |