Text
Leadership is at a crossroads in the comparative culture area. A recent movement called GLOBE, fathered by Robert House, invites researchers to move in a radically new positivistic but misguided direction. This paper contrasts GLOBE with the Third Culture Bonding (TCB) approach to the understanding of leadership in different cultural populations and in different national cultures. The thesis is that the authors of the GLOBE study claim too much cross-cultural ecological and construct validity and generalizability for their research findings and recommendations to date. GLOBE project reasearchers are cautioned about the dangers of making broad interpretations based on their empirical findings.Printed Journal
Call Number | Location | Available |
---|---|---|
AMP2004 | PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
Penerbit | Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management 2006 |
---|---|
Edisi | Vol. 20, No. 4, Nov., 2006 |
Subjek | GLOBE Project Third Culture Bonding (TCB) Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Average Leadership Style (ALS) dyadic leadership |
ISBN/ISSN | 15589080 |
Klasifikasi | NONE |
Deskripsi Fisik | 7 p. |
Info Detail Spesifik | Academy of Management Perspectives |
Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
Lampiran Berkas |