Text
Evidence-based management and the marketplace for ideas
In the marketplace for ideas in the broad field of management, and in human resource management in particular, academics are jostling for position along with consultants, journalists, and practitioners. The most fundamental question that each party seeks to answer is this: "What does it take to get ahead of the competition?" Presented are some possible answers from the perspectives of the various parties - answers that illustrate the range of strategies employed. Academics take pride in using the scientific method to create new knowledge. That is, they frame questions that are testable and falsifiable with data-based results. To academics, it is a given that theory-based, empirical data published in an A-level, peer-reviewed journal constitute objective, declarative knowledge that "sells." Major emphasis is placed in the creation of knowledge, rather than on its diffusion. Academics assume that their work will be read by other professionals, including consultants and practitioners, and that the implications for the application of their findings are obvious. Consultants, on the other hand, often generate survey data of firm- or industry-specific studies on which to base recommendations for action.Printed journal
Ketersediaan
| Call Number | Location | Available |
|---|---|---|
| PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
| Penerbit | : Academy of Management |
|---|---|
| Edisi | - |
| Subjek | Strategic planning Competition Research Management styles Evidence |
| ISBN/ISSN | 14273 |
| Klasifikasi | - |
| Deskripsi Fisik | - |
| Info Detail Spesifik | - |
| Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
| Lampiran Berkas | Tidak Ada Data |