Text
Don't shoot the messenger: a wake-up call for academics
The challenge of communicating scientific knowledge to practitioners confronts all fields of science. In the past decade, with significant contributions from leading figures, this debate has entered the discourse of management research. The Rynes, Giluk, and Brown "separate worlds" study takes this debate a step further by exploring the role of a distinctive group of communicators of knowledge. Rynes et. al. make three main claims: First, academic experts agree about evidence supporting the benefits of using specific practices - including a number about which practitioners have muddled or incorrect beliefs - and agree to some extent about specific important human resource (HR) findings that they believe all managers should know about. Secondly, intermediate practitioner-oriented publications should communicate this information to practitioners, and such communication should be of appropriate quantity and quality; in other words, coverage of the information should accurately reflect the academic evidence. Thirdly, the existing evidence suggests that US intermediary publications fail on both counts.Printed journal
Ketersediaan
| Call Number | Location | Available |
|---|---|---|
| PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
| Penerbit | : Academy of Management |
|---|---|
| Edisi | - |
| Subjek | Human resource management Research Management styles Evidence Publications |
| ISBN/ISSN | 14273 |
| Klasifikasi | - |
| Deskripsi Fisik | - |
| Info Detail Spesifik | - |
| Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
| Lampiran Berkas | Tidak Ada Data |