Text
Bridging the worlds
In their keynote article for this editors' forum, Rynes, Giluk, and Brown show that practitioner journals cover very little of the most robust research related to human resources management (HRM). The authors express concern about this disconnect and propose that this ongoing gap has negative consequences for both HRM practice and research. As a research-based practitioner within a corporation, the author agrees with their concerns. The research contributions and evidence-based findings of HR researchers (industrial/organizational psychologists, organizational behaviorists, and scholars in other related fields) are of great potential value for HR practitioners. HR practitioners are at a crossroads, and they need and want to be more evidence-based. Their role is shifting from tactical to strategic, and with this shift, they have a clear requirement to demonstrate rigor in what they do and to show value to their organizations. However, as Rynes and her coauthors demonstrate, HR practitioner journals do not cover the findings of HR researchers.Printed journal
Call Number | Location | Available |
---|---|---|
PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
Penerbit | Academy of Management., |
---|---|
Edisi | - |
Subjek | Human resource management Research Management styles Evidence |
ISBN/ISSN | 14273 |
Klasifikasi | - |
Deskripsi Fisik | - |
Info Detail Spesifik | - |
Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
Lampiran Berkas | Tidak Ada Data |