Logo

Pusat Sumber Belajar FEB UI

  • FAQ
  • Berita
  • Rooms
  • Bantuan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Indonesia
  • Search
  • Google
  • Advanced Search
*sometimes there will be ads at the top, just scroll down to the results of this web
No image available for this title

Text

Deals without delusions

Lovallo, Dan - ; Viguerie, Patrick - ; Uhlaner, Robert - ; Horn, John - ;

Pursuing a merger or acquisition is inherently difficult. Things get even harder when executives are blind to their own faulty assumptions. The authors identify biases that can surface at each step of the M&A process and provide practical tips for rising above them - an approach they call targeted debiasing. During the preliminary due-diligence stage, biases abound. To overcome the confirmation bias, aggressively seek evidence that challenges your initial hypothesis about a deal. The best medicine for overconfidence in identifying revenue and cost synergies is to learn from precedents at your firm and others. Avoiding underestimation of cultural differences between your company and the target requires understanding the differences in the ways people interact at each organization. Misjudging the time and resources you need is at the core of the planning fallacy, which you can elude by formally identifying best practices and continually revisiting them. Finally, dilute conflict of interest by soliciting dispassionate external expertise. .Printed journal


Ketersediaan

Call NumberLocationAvailable
PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana1
Penerbit: Harvard Business School Publishing
Edisi-
SubjekStrategic planning
Executives
Due diligence
Acquisitions & Mergers
Bias
Best practice
ISBN/ISSN178012
Klasifikasi-
Deskripsi Fisik-
Info Detail Spesifik-
Other Version/RelatedTidak tersedia versi lain
Lampiran BerkasTidak Ada Data

Pencarian Spesifik
Where do you want to share?