No image available for this title

Text

Refereeing the game of peer review

In this dialogue, I depict the journal peer review process as a high-stakes game involving three parties: editor, reviewer, and author. In light of a not-infrequent transposition of what should have been a constructive professional development process into a self-promotional social process, critiques of peer review have abounded, such as the "as-is" process recently recommended by Eric Tsang and Bruno Frey in this journal. While the "as-is" process highlights and potentially remedies some of the abuses of the system, there may be less radical options through professional education and development to preserve the critical developmental function of peer review. .Printed journal

Ketersediaan

Call NumberLocationAvailable
PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana1
Penerbit The Academy of Management.,
Edisi -
Subjek Conflict
Criticism
Editors
Writers
Processes
Peer review
ISBN/ISSN 1537260X
Klasifikasi -
Deskripsi Fisik -
Info Detail Spesifik -
Other Version/Related Tidak tersedia versi lain
Lampiran Berkas Tidak Ada Data