Logo

Pusat Sumber Belajar FEB UI

  • FAQ
  • Berita
  • Rooms
  • Bantuan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Indonesia
  • Search
  • Google
  • Advanced Search
*sometimes there will be ads at the top, just scroll down to the results of this web
No image available for this title

Text

Has goal setting gone wild, or have its attackers abandoned good scholarship?

Locke, Edwin A. - ; Latham, Gary P. - ;

We believe that Ord??ez, Schweitzer, Galinsky, and Bazerman (2009), in their critique of goal setting, have breached the principles of good scholarship. Rather than conducting or integrating research, they chose to draw their central theme from anecdotal evidence. Further, they employ unrepresentative citations from the literature, the misreporting of results, and the use of emotionally laden metaphors rather than dispassionate language. Moreover, almost all the pitfalls of goal setting they cite, rather than being original, have already been published-by us. In this rejoinder, we highlight these shortcomings.Printed journal


Ketersediaan

Call NumberLocationAvailable
AMP2301PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana1
PenerbitBriarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management 2009
EdisiVol. 23, No. 1, Feb., 2009
SubjekScholarship
Intrinsic motivation
Ethical Behavior
Goal setting
self-efficacy
anecdotal evidence
scientific rigor
ISBN/ISSN15589080
KlasifikasiNONE
Deskripsi Fisik7 p.
Info Detail SpesifikAcademy of Management Perspectives
Other Version/RelatedTidak tersedia versi lain
Lampiran Berkas
  • Has Goal Setting Gone Wild, or Have Its Attackers Abandoned Good Scholarship?
    Other Resource Link

Pencarian Spesifik
Where do you want to share?