Logo

Pusat Sumber Belajar FEB UI

  • FAQ
  • Berita
  • Rooms
  • Bantuan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Indonesia
  • Search
  • Google
  • Advanced Search
*sometimes there will be ads at the top, just scroll down to the results of this web
No image available for this title

Text

Science and ethics: what should count as evidence against the use of goal setting?

Locke, Edwin A. - ; Latham, Gary P. - ;

Ordonez, Schweitzer, Galinsky, and Bazerman (2009a, 2009b) drew upon three sources of information to buttress their conclusion that goal setting should be used in organizations with extreme caution: laboratory experiments, stories in the news media about prescription drugs that have negative side effects, and organizations that have not performed effectively. In this paper we examine these three sources. We conclude by recognizing that our disagreements with Ordonez are not small and list several reasons why we are not sanguine about the possibility of reconciliation..Printed journal


Ketersediaan

Call NumberLocationAvailable
AMP2303PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana1
PenerbitBriarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management 2009
EdisiVol. 23, No. 3, Aug., 2009
SubjekBusiness ethics
Science
studies
Goal setting
ISBN/ISSN15589080
KlasifikasiNONE
Deskripsi Fisik4 p.
Info Detail SpesifikAcademy of Management Perspectives
Other Version/RelatedTidak tersedia versi lain
Lampiran Berkas
  • Science and Ethics: What Should Count as Evidence against the Use of Goal Setting?
    Other Resource Link

Pencarian Spesifik
Where do you want to share?