Logo

Pusat Sumber Belajar FEB UI

  • FAQ
  • Berita
  • Rooms
  • Bantuan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Indonesia
  • Search
  • Google
  • Advanced Search
*sometimes there will be ads at the top, just scroll down to the results of this web
No image available for this title

Text

Safety-net losses from abandoning glass-steagall restrictions

Kane, Edward J. - ; Carow, Kenneth A. - ; Narayanan, Rajesh P. - ;

This paper evaluates the redistribution of gains surrounding regulatory relaxations in 1996 and 1997 and ultimate passage of the Financial Services Modernization Act (FSMA) of 1999. Gains in financial institution stocks may come from projected increases in efficiency, increases in the bargaining power of financial institutions, or greater access to the federal safety net. For customers seeking improved access to capital markets, gains in efficiency should result in increased benefits, but increases in bank bargaining power could increase funding costs and/or decrease capital market access. Customers may also lose as taxpayers who support the federal safety net. This paper finds evidence of potential taxpayer losses and increased bank bargaining power, especially vis-a-vis credit-constrained customers for whom safety-net subsidies are unlikely to be shifted forward. The stock prices of credit-constrained customers declined during FSMA event windows and in event windows associated with regulatory relaxations..Printed journal


Ketersediaan

Call NumberLocationAvailable
JMCB4307PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana1
Penerbit: The Ohio State University
Edisi-
SubjekCapital markets
Subsidies
US
Bargaining
studies
Regulation of financial institutions
Financial Services Modernization Act 1999
ISBN/ISSN222879
Klasifikasi-
Deskripsi Fisik-
Info Detail Spesifik-
Other Version/RelatedTidak tersedia versi lain
Lampiran BerkasTidak Ada Data

Pencarian Spesifik
Where do you want to share?