Logo

Pusat Sumber Belajar FEB UI

  • FAQ
  • Berita
  • Rooms
  • Bantuan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Indonesia
  • Search
  • Google
  • Advanced Search
*sometimes there will be ads at the top, just scroll down to the results of this web
No image available for this title

Text

Why did holdings of highly rated securitization tranches differ so much across banks?

Stulz, Rene M. - ; Erel, Isil - ; Nadauld, Taylor - ;

We provide estimates of holdings of highly rated securitization tranches of U.S. bank holding companies before the credit crisis and evaluate hypotheses that have been advanced to explain them. Whereas holdings exceeded Tier 1 capital for some large banks, they were economically trivial for the typical bank. Banks with high holdings were not riskier before the crisis using conventional measures, but they performed poorly during the crisis. We find that holdings of highly rated tranches were correlated with a bank's securitization activity. Theories unrelated to the securitization activity, such as "bad incentives" or "bad risk management," are not supported in the data.


Ketersediaan

Call NumberLocationAvailable
RFS2702PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana1
PenerbitOxford: Oxford University Press 2014
EdisiVol. 27 No. 2, Feb 2014
SubjekFinance
ISBN/ISSN1465-7368
KlasifikasiNONE
Deskripsi Fisik661 p.
Info Detail SpesifikThe Review of Financial Studies
Other Version/RelatedTidak tersedia versi lain
Lampiran Berkas
  • Why Did Holdings of Highly Rated Securitization Tranches Differ So Much across Banks?

Pencarian Spesifik
Where do you want to share?