Text
Terrorism experts continue to debate how and why people become radicalised and commit violence. Significantly less emphasis and coherence of thought has been deployed to understand those processes in reverse. From the perspective of counterterrorism practitioners within both government and civil society, the question has tended to bifurcate around two contrasting conceptual approaches: should the focus be on ‘deradicalization’ (an internal or philosophical outcome seeking change in beliefs, values and attitudes) or ‘disengagement’ (a social or temporal outcome seeking change in behaviours away from violence)? This article seeks to contribute to the debate about how disengagement functions and stands as a practical and effective counterterrorism methodology, and is based on detailed analysis of field work and project implementation in Indonesia.5Thisarticle and the methodologies implemented and tested are grounded in previous research on disengagement of Indonesian jihadists and countering violent extremism (CVE) projects conducted by several of the authors over many years, and extends and codifies the findings of a valuable body of earlier academic literature.
Call Number | Location | Available |
---|---|---|
PSB lt.2 - Karya Akhir (Majalah) | 1 |
Penerbit | Depok: UIII 2023 |
---|---|
Edisi | Vol. 2 No. 1, 2023 |
Subjek | Indonesia Terrorism countering violent extremism disengagement deradicalization returnees |
ISBN/ISSN | 2829-3568 |
Klasifikasi | NONE |
Deskripsi Fisik | 136 p. |
Info Detail Spesifik | Muslim Politics Review |
Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
Lampiran Berkas |