Text
Based on earlier taxonomies of group composition models, aggregating data from individual-level responses to operationalize group-level constructs is a common aspect of management research. The present study contributes to the literature on group composition models by quantitatively integrating the climate literature via meta-analysis to determine which of the two most common methods of aggregation, direct consensus and referent-shift consensus, is the stronger predictor of group-level outcomes. We found that referent-shift consensus was a stronger predictor of job performance and customer service performance than direct consensus. However, we found that direct consensus was a stronger predictor of job attitudes than referent-shift consensus. We also found that climate-performance relationships were moderated by aggregation method of the performance criterion. The implications of these findings for advancing multi-level theory and research are discussed.
| Call Number | Location | Available |
|---|---|---|
| PSB lt.dasar - Pascasarjana | 1 |
| Penerbit | United States: Sage Publication 2016 |
|---|---|
| Edisi | Vol. 42 No. 4, May 2016 |
| Subjek | Teams groups/group processes/dynamics culture and climate hierarchical linear modeling (HLM)/multi-level |
| ISBN/ISSN | 1557-1211 |
| Klasifikasi | NONE |
| Deskripsi Fisik | 1029 p. |
| Info Detail Spesifik | Journal of Management |
| Other Version/Related | Tidak tersedia versi lain |
| Lampiran Berkas |