Logo

Pusat Sumber Belajar FEB UI

  • FAQ
  • Berita
  • Rooms
  • Bantuan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Indonesia
  • Search
  • Google
  • Advanced Search
*sometimes there will be ads at the top, just scroll down to the results of this web
Image of Auctions versus Negotiations: The Role of the Payment Structure

Text

Auctions versus Negotiations: The Role of the Payment Structure

Hoffman, Florian - ; Vladimirov, Vladimir - ;

We investigate a seller's strategic choice between optimally structured negotiations with fewer bidders and an auction with more competing bidders when payments can have a contingent component, as is common in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), patent licensing, and employee compensation. The key factor favoring negotiations is that it allows the seller to set her preferred payment structure—that is, the revenue-maximizing mix of cash and contingent pay; reserve prices are of secondary importance. Negotiations are more likely to dominate if synergies increase in bidders' productivity types (as with acquirer-target complementarities in M&A). Higher dispersion and magnitude of bidders' private valuations also favor negotiations.


Ketersediaan

Call NumberLocationAvailable
PSB lt.2 - Karya Akhir (Majalah)1
PenerbitUnited States: American Finance Association 2025
EdisiVol. 80 Issue 3, Jun 2025
SubjekAuctions
Negotiations
Payment Structure
ISBN/ISSN1540-6261
KlasifikasiNONE
Deskripsi Fisik542 p.
Info Detail SpesifikThe Journal of Finance
Other Version/RelatedTidak tersedia versi lain
Lampiran Berkas
  • Auctions versus Negotiations: The Role of the Payment Structure

Pencarian Spesifik
Where do you want to share?